Comments on: New Socks and Underwear! http://www.mitchmagee.com/blog/2005/11/08/new-socks-and-underware/ Just another WordPress weblog Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:05:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: sanjay http://www.mitchmagee.com/blog/2005/11/08/new-socks-and-underware/comment-page-1/#comment-21173 sanjay Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:18:44 +0000 http://www.mitchmagee.com/blog/?p=16#comment-21173 DIXCY is otherwise also a popular brand of inner wears in India. I object to your remarks in last paragraph: "You will notice that in typical Indian fashion, the Dixcy people have arranged their underwear according to a strict Caste System". Could you please enlighten me on how you have arrived at such conclusion. DIXCY is otherwise also a popular brand of inner wears in India. I object to your remarks in last paragraph:

“You will notice that in typical Indian fashion, the Dixcy people have arranged their underwear according to a strict Caste System”.

Could you please enlighten me on how you have arrived at such conclusion.

]]> By: Anita http://www.mitchmagee.com/blog/2005/11/08/new-socks-and-underware/comment-page-1/#comment-98 Anita Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:32:48 +0000 http://www.mitchmagee.com/blog/?p=16#comment-98 aren't there other types of under 'wares' as well ... hmmm ... aren’t there other types of under ‘wares’ as well … hmmm …

]]> By: kaveri http://www.mitchmagee.com/blog/2005/11/08/new-socks-and-underware/comment-page-1/#comment-56 kaveri Wed, 09 Nov 2005 04:49:13 +0000 http://www.mitchmagee.com/blog/?p=16#comment-56 no pictures? no pictures?

]]> By: Mitch http://www.mitchmagee.com/blog/2005/11/08/new-socks-and-underware/comment-page-1/#comment-55 Mitch Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:48:50 +0000 http://www.mitchmagee.com/blog/?p=16#comment-55 Thanks for the pointers, folks. I'm changing the post to the more conventional spelling—"underwear". Which is, unfortunately, the only spelling. Thanks for the pointers, folks. I’m changing the post to the more conventional spelling—”underwear”. Which is, unfortunately, the only spelling.

]]> By: Alex http://www.mitchmagee.com/blog/2005/11/08/new-socks-and-underware/comment-page-1/#comment-54 Alex Wed, 09 Nov 2005 02:40:43 +0000 http://www.mitchmagee.com/blog/?p=16#comment-54 I'm particularly happy that socks and underware is its very own category and not living in the (entirely inappropriate for this topic) 'Uncategorized' category. And, wait a second, if it's under "categories" technically it's not uncategorized is it? I’m particularly happy that socks and underware is its very own category and not living in the (entirely inappropriate for this topic) ‘Uncategorized’ category. And, wait a second, if it’s under “categories” technically it’s not uncategorized is it?

]]> By: t. http://www.mitchmagee.com/blog/2005/11/08/new-socks-and-underware/comment-page-1/#comment-53 t. Wed, 09 Nov 2005 01:27:52 +0000 http://www.mitchmagee.com/blog/?p=16#comment-53 you spelled underwear wrong. Otherwise, I thought this posting was top-notch. you spelled underwear wrong. Otherwise, I thought this posting was top-notch.

]]>